Harmanpreet hails Sciver-Brunt and Ismail after MI make 150 look ‘like 180’

“The way we played today, we fought till the last ball, even though we didn’t start the way we wanted,” Harmanpreet, who was also the Player of the Match for her 44-ball 66, said at the presentation. “But I think it’s all about being there, doing the right things again and again, and that’s what we were thinking and we were trying [to do].”

“It wasn’t easy when I went to bat, but I had that belief that if I stay there and keep rotating the strike, when Nat is there I don’t need to take too much pressure because she’s been in great touch and she was doing the job for the team,” Harmanpreet said. “I just wanted to support her at that time, and I think that partnership with Nat was amazing. We tried to keep things simple and easy and whoever was there took calculated risks at that time.”

“I think 150 was not a decent total [against] DC, but matches like that are always pressure games – 150 in these kind of games always looks like 180. I think credit goes to our bowlers. They had that belief that they can give us breakthroughs in the powerplay. It was good to see Ismail bring important wickets for us, and the other side how Nat bowled. They created that opportunity for us, and they got us [into] the game, really happy with the way everybody in the team bowled today.”

“We made things very clear for everyone [before the season],” Harmanpreet said. “We had very good one-to-one meetings where we tried to [clarify] their roles for the team. We knew we have four experienced bowlers, they can do the job for [us] but it’s a T20 and [the other] four overs are always important. We knew that whoever is in the game that day, we’ll try to give them that opportunity to do the job for us.

“Today Saika was there, she did a great job for us, she bowled those crucial three overs for us. Before that Amanjot was there and in between Sanskriti did a really good job for us. They knew their role, they knew whenever they are there they have to deliver in the best way. I really enjoy playing with them.”

Lanning: ‘One more partnership may have given us a chance’

“We haven’t been able to put our best performances on the board in the final, which is disappointing, but that’s cricket,” she said. “It’s no fault of anyone’s. We came in here as prepped as we could be to do as well as we could, and it just hasn’t happened for us. It’s been different each time around.

DC lost openers Meg Lanning and Shafali Verma inside the first three overs of their chase•BCCI

“We’re bitterly disappointed, we feel like we put ourselves into a good position to win, but that’s the game. You win some, you lose some, and unfortunately we’ve been on the wrong side.”

Lanning felt 150 was chaseable, and one more partnership could have taken DC over the line.

“We didn’t quite get it together with the bat,” she said. “I thought chasing 150 was a pretty good target for us, and just one more partnership there for a couple of overs may have given us a chance. But very proud of the group, we put in a good season, we had some really good moments, but yeah, we’re all pretty disappointed.”

DC topped the league table, but this meant they came into the final a full eight days after their last game. Lanning didn’t think this made any significant difference to the way the final went.

“I’m not sure. Some people will say Mumbai might be tired, so you can’t win these things. I don’t think there’s any right or wrong way to do it. It’s about performing well on the night, and Mumbai were too good for us tonight.”